<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possibilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/</link>
	<description>Before &#38; After&#039;s creative director John McWade&#039;s conversations with subscribers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:24:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mushtaq</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mushtaq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2985</guid>
		<description>I see this article as on two separate lines -- which may or may not be parallel:

A wonderfully written life view, and a perspective on the devices that impact it.

I&#039;m definitely in agreement with John&#039;s life view.

And the impact of everything upon it is secondary.

In other words, the impact of the iPad is secondary to how I&#039;d approach design, for example.

Let me clarify: I cannot create with the iPad. I can only consume. Is that a limiting statement? Perhaps.

Am I imposing limits on myself by saying that? Well, let&#039;s take a look:

I&#039;ve been using the iPad since it came out, and I find it to be a beautifully designed device. The interaction and interface with the iPad is seductive. And yes, applications yet to be developed may alter my thinking in some ways. But at a fundamental level, we need materials/tools that will deliver the results of our creative endeavors, whether it&#039;s something as simple as pencil and paper, or as complicated as software applications/hard-drive storage and a usable keyboard.

It&#039;s the difference between creating and consuming.

I see that as the defining difference between the iPad and other tablet or computing devices.

Will the iPad become a creative device? I don&#039;t think it was designed to be that.

It&#039;s a beautifully designed consuming device, but when I need to create, I leave it for  my computer, for my paper and pencil, for my other tools.

And how true are the words of Len Williams . . . a clean slate can start anytime for those who dream!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this article as on two separate lines &#8212; which may or may not be parallel:</p>
<p>A wonderfully written life view, and a perspective on the devices that impact it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m definitely in agreement with John&#8217;s life view.</p>
<p>And the impact of everything upon it is secondary.</p>
<p>In other words, the impact of the iPad is secondary to how I&#8217;d approach design, for example.</p>
<p>Let me clarify: I cannot create with the iPad. I can only consume. Is that a limiting statement? Perhaps.</p>
<p>Am I imposing limits on myself by saying that? Well, let&#8217;s take a look:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using the iPad since it came out, and I find it to be a beautifully designed device. The interaction and interface with the iPad is seductive. And yes, applications yet to be developed may alter my thinking in some ways. But at a fundamental level, we need materials/tools that will deliver the results of our creative endeavors, whether it&#8217;s something as simple as pencil and paper, or as complicated as software applications/hard-drive storage and a usable keyboard.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the difference between creating and consuming.</p>
<p>I see that as the defining difference between the iPad and other tablet or computing devices.</p>
<p>Will the iPad become a creative device? I don&#8217;t think it was designed to be that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a beautifully designed consuming device, but when I need to create, I leave it for  my computer, for my paper and pencil, for my other tools.</p>
<p>And how true are the words of Len Williams . . . a clean slate can start anytime for those who dream!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GA</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2983</guid>
		<description>My grandmother lived to 99 and walked till the day she died. She never had a cell phone, computer, Kindle, iPod and whatnot. She lived more than everyone I know today.  People are now connected to equipment and not people. I love design, but slow down and appreciate what you have, and stop buying a new cell phone, computer and whatnot each year. These items are bad for the environment. I&#039;ve had the same cell phone and computer for almost six years now. Still work. I do not need an iPad and never want to read a book on a screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grandmother lived to 99 and walked till the day she died. She never had a cell phone, computer, Kindle, iPod and whatnot. She lived more than everyone I know today.  People are now connected to equipment and not people. I love design, but slow down and appreciate what you have, and stop buying a new cell phone, computer and whatnot each year. These items are bad for the environment. I&#8217;ve had the same cell phone and computer for almost six years now. Still work. I do not need an iPad and never want to read a book on a screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffeebeanzzz</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>coffeebeanzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 03:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2981</guid>
		<description>This is the device I&#039;ve wished for, waited for. Something in between the too-small screen of my iPhone, smaller and more maneuverable than my iMcac. I wished for it before I knew it existed. To sit on my couch, or my bed, to watch when I wanted. To take into my kitchen to display a complicated recipe, to hang it on a cabinet wall like a photograph or a piece of art , but not as a static piece, but a dynamic work of art that will help me find whatever I need, and display it for me. I see it not as a closed-end device, but rather open, to discover together what I want and need from it. If I was gainfully employed at the moment, I would already have one working for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the device I&#8217;ve wished for, waited for. Something in between the too-small screen of my iPhone, smaller and more maneuverable than my iMcac. I wished for it before I knew it existed. To sit on my couch, or my bed, to watch when I wanted. To take into my kitchen to display a complicated recipe, to hang it on a cabinet wall like a photograph or a piece of art , but not as a static piece, but a dynamic work of art that will help me find whatever I need, and display it for me. I see it not as a closed-end device, but rather open, to discover together what I want and need from it. If I was gainfully employed at the moment, I would already have one working for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>Wonderful advice for life and work near the end of this piece. It made me feel good about the future in general, whatever it ends up being. 

Like Truthbearer, I can&#039;t help but notice that really great inventions get their share of fans along with a number of doubting non-fans. 

Back in Edison&#039;s day, there must have been people who greeted the invention of the light bulb by lamenting the death of the gas lamp.

&quot;Why spend extra money when gas lamps work so well?&quot;

&quot;So what? It&#039;s only an electric gas lamp.&quot;

&quot;Light bulbs need constant replacement. It&#039;s a scam.&quot;

&quot;I already have gas lamps in my house.&quot;

&quot;I&#039;m waiting for light bulb 2.0.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful advice for life and work near the end of this piece. It made me feel good about the future in general, whatever it ends up being. </p>
<p>Like Truthbearer, I can&#8217;t help but notice that really great inventions get their share of fans along with a number of doubting non-fans. </p>
<p>Back in Edison&#8217;s day, there must have been people who greeted the invention of the light bulb by lamenting the death of the gas lamp.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why spend extra money when gas lamps work so well?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what? It&#8217;s only an electric gas lamp.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Light bulbs need constant replacement. It&#8217;s a scam.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I already have gas lamps in my house.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m waiting for light bulb 2.0.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truthbearer</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2978</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthbearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2978</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  Two things --
 
1. There is lots of precedent for defining new things in terms of what we have and what is different -- i.e.; horseless carriage, wireless (radio); tubeless tires, now wireless telephones. Good sales are always based on establishing common ground and  then building from there.

2.  All change is initially seen as loss and must and will be mourned accordingly.  With it come four emotions: Mad, Sad, Bad and finally and wonderfully Glad.  

The way that translates into new technology is that for three months the new user says angrily, &quot;It doesn&#039;t do it like the old systems.&quot; For the next three months the user says sadly, &quot;I guess I can make it do what I need.&quot; And finally at six months or after, they begin to say gladly, &quot;Wow, this really is a better way to do things.&quot;  

Now it is time for the next new product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  Two things &#8211;</p>
<p>1. There is lots of precedent for defining new things in terms of what we have and what is different &#8212; i.e.; horseless carriage, wireless (radio); tubeless tires, now wireless telephones. Good sales are always based on establishing common ground and  then building from there.</p>
<p>2.  All change is initially seen as loss and must and will be mourned accordingly.  With it come four emotions: Mad, Sad, Bad and finally and wonderfully Glad.  </p>
<p>The way that translates into new technology is that for three months the new user says angrily, &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t do it like the old systems.&#8221; For the next three months the user says sadly, &#8220;I guess I can make it do what I need.&#8221; And finally at six months or after, they begin to say gladly, &#8220;Wow, this really is a better way to do things.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Now it is time for the next new product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer saffo</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2977</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer saffo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2977</guid>
		<description>Beautiful thoughts as always. Can&#039;t wait to see your B&amp;A iPad app !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful thoughts as always. Can&#8217;t wait to see your B&amp;A iPad app !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G.</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2975</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2975</guid>
		<description>Great piece, and piece of mind. I&#039;ve been imagining &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; we can use what&#039;s out there to do new things. The iPad seems to be one of those devices that&#039;s just such a great tool for new &quot;hows.&quot;

I remember in a news meeting being mesmerized by a PC that had a touch screen, a stylus and a flip display. News designers could sketch a page right there on the spot and pass it around.

Looks like another &quot;how&quot; moment just got better. But maybe less the print side . . . I guess today we would be sketching web possibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece, and piece of mind. I&#8217;ve been imagining <em>how</em> we can use what&#8217;s out there to do new things. The iPad seems to be one of those devices that&#8217;s just such a great tool for new &#8220;hows.&#8221;</p>
<p>I remember in a news meeting being mesmerized by a PC that had a touch screen, a stylus and a flip display. News designers could sketch a page right there on the spot and pass it around.</p>
<p>Looks like another &#8220;how&#8221; moment just got better. But maybe less the print side . . . I guess today we would be sketching web possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modernheretic</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Modernheretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 14:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>I have yet to see anyone hold this device comfortably, and with talk of a kickstand and keyboard, wouldn&#039;t that just make it a desktop/laptop/netbook again? Sure, it&#039;s a nice, colorful reader, and you can do things with it that you can already do on your phone -- an added luxury for the gotta-have-it gadget fiend? or a revolutionary product that acts, does and does less, I might add, than what you already can do with what you already own.

You decide. It&#039;s your money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to see anyone hold this device comfortably, and with talk of a kickstand and keyboard, wouldn&#8217;t that just make it a desktop/laptop/netbook again? Sure, it&#8217;s a nice, colorful reader, and you can do things with it that you can already do on your phone &#8212; an added luxury for the gotta-have-it gadget fiend? or a revolutionary product that acts, does and does less, I might add, than what you already can do with what you already own.</p>
<p>You decide. It&#8217;s your money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A-Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>A-Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>Good perspective. I hadn&#039;t thought about the iPad in that way. So many tech blogs and reviewers feel that they have to be first and loudest, and the easiest way to do that is to find faults. Thanks for taking the time to focus on the possibilities.

And a great reminder about the importance of original work. So much we do requires the approval of others (bosses, clients, etc.), I had forgotten that real innovation often isn&#039;t appreciated when it first appears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good perspective. I hadn&#8217;t thought about the iPad in that way. So many tech blogs and reviewers feel that they have to be first and loudest, and the easiest way to do that is to find faults. Thanks for taking the time to focus on the possibilities.</p>
<p>And a great reminder about the importance of original work. So much we do requires the approval of others (bosses, clients, etc.), I had forgotten that real innovation often isn&#8217;t appreciated when it first appears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mev Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2010/05/possibilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Mev Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=3938#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>Excellent. Perfectly put. 

Just like the iPod changed the way we listen to music, the iPad will change the way we are informed and entertained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent. Perfectly put. </p>
<p>Just like the iPod changed the way we listen to music, the iPad will change the way we are informed and entertained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

