<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The soul of the Empire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/</link>
	<description>Before &#38; After&#039;s creative director John McWade&#039;s conversations with subscribers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:50:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilmi Hamdan</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-3/#comment-2572</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilmi Hamdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2572</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I really like the 2014 logo.

To be frank, the firebird logo didn&#039;t even catch my eye. I had already scrolled down a bit and saw it: &quot;Wow, that&#039;s nice, so where&#039;s this logo?&quot;

After finding out it was the logo, I really like it, great job. I mean, you can read it in many different ways: Sochi.ru2014 Olympics, Sochi 2014, .ru Olympics, sochi Olympics. Ingenious, not forgetting the .ru, reminding us that Russia is truly part of the digital age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I really like the 2014 logo.</p>
<p>To be frank, the firebird logo didn&#8217;t even catch my eye. I had already scrolled down a bit and saw it: &#8220;Wow, that&#8217;s nice, so where&#8217;s this logo?&#8221;</p>
<p>After finding out it was the logo, I really like it, great job. I mean, you can read it in many different ways: Sochi.ru2014 Olympics, Sochi 2014, .ru Olympics, sochi Olympics. Ingenious, not forgetting the .ru, reminding us that Russia is truly part of the digital age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seezee</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2521</link>
		<dc:creator>seezee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2521</guid>
		<description>When I first saw the accepted design, I did not read the numerals as &quot;2014&quot;. Instead, I saw &quot;zoiY&quot;. Only after reading the article did I see that they were numerals. So I can&#039;t say I&#039;m a fan of the design, purely on legibility grounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first saw the accepted design, I did not read the numerals as &#8220;2014&#8243;. Instead, I saw &#8220;zoiY&#8221;. Only after reading the article did I see that they were numerals. So I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m a fan of the design, purely on legibility grounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pettersen</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2402</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pettersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2402</guid>
		<description>Very interesting to read John&#039;s critique and the other comments, and, having looked at the link to the previous designs on this page, I believe that the official logo is right on the money.

It has a direct connection to the Internet — .ru really is up to date but still has a retro feel (very up to date?), as it references early Russian revolutionary posters.

What really appeals is that the logo and the place are the same. On all previous designs, the logo had to be enforced with the name and date of the host city. I also like the idea of Sochi and 2014 like it was the mirror image reflected in ice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to read John&#8217;s critique and the other comments, and, having looked at the link to the previous designs on this page, I believe that the official logo is right on the money.</p>
<p>It has a direct connection to the Internet — .ru really is up to date but still has a retro feel (very up to date?), as it references early Russian revolutionary posters.</p>
<p>What really appeals is that the logo and the place are the same. On all previous designs, the logo had to be enforced with the name and date of the host city. I also like the idea of Sochi and 2014 like it was the mirror image reflected in ice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marieke</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2401</link>
		<dc:creator>Marieke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2401</guid>
		<description>When I look at the logo, I feel that the Olympic rings are &quot;falling off&quot; the logo and can not carry the weight of the fat lettering in the final logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I look at the logo, I feel that the Olympic rings are &#8220;falling off&#8221; the logo and can not carry the weight of the fat lettering in the final logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Jewett (moshi creative)</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Jewett (moshi creative)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis of the Transformer logo, John. However, I feel the official logo fails for similar reasons. 

True, it&#039;s Russian, wintry and today . . . but it does nothing to speak to the host city.

According to Wikipedia (&#039;cause hey, what do I know?), Sochi is a popular resort town on the Black Sea near the Caucasus mountains. If it&#039;s not an instantly recognizable city, then shouldn&#039;t that host city logo educate or at least inform a little of its surroundings/history/landmarks/etc.? I&#039;m not suggesting the &quot;low-hanging&quot; fruit version of this logo (mountains and reflection), but when viewing logos from previous host cities (Squaw Valley &#039;60, Innsbruck &#039;64, Turin &#039;06), it seems there is just a bit more thought put into them (see some examples &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/08/01/sports/20080802_TORCH_GRAPHIC.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).

Indeed, it&#039;s a great Russian 2014 winter Olympics logo . . . just a miserable Sochi 2014 winter Olympics logo . . . imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis of the Transformer logo, John. However, I feel the official logo fails for similar reasons. </p>
<p>True, it&#8217;s Russian, wintry and today . . . but it does nothing to speak to the host city.</p>
<p>According to Wikipedia (&#8217;cause hey, what do I know?), Sochi is a popular resort town on the Black Sea near the Caucasus mountains. If it&#8217;s not an instantly recognizable city, then shouldn&#8217;t that host city logo educate or at least inform a little of its surroundings/history/landmarks/etc.? I&#8217;m not suggesting the &#8220;low-hanging&#8221; fruit version of this logo (mountains and reflection), but when viewing logos from previous host cities (Squaw Valley &#8217;60, Innsbruck &#8217;64, Turin &#8217;06), it seems there is just a bit more thought put into them (see some examples <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/08/01/sports/20080802_TORCH_GRAPHIC.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>).</p>
<p>Indeed, it&#8217;s a great Russian 2014 winter Olympics logo . . . just a miserable Sochi 2014 winter Olympics logo . . . imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>I had a talk about this logo with an older gentleman from Poland. He immediately said, &quot;ah — that — is Russia&quot; to the official logo without me saying which one it was, and he asked if the other one had been for the games in Nagano! Go figure. 

There&#039;s something to this logo that will resonate with a vast amount of people.  

While the firebird logo is frankly beautiful, it is not strong, and by strong I mean masculine, forceful, cold and bold. And that is what Russia sees itself as and needs to be seen as.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a talk about this logo with an older gentleman from Poland. He immediately said, &#8220;ah — that — is Russia&#8221; to the official logo without me saying which one it was, and he asked if the other one had been for the games in Nagano! Go figure. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s something to this logo that will resonate with a vast amount of people.  </p>
<p>While the firebird logo is frankly beautiful, it is not strong, and by strong I mean masculine, forceful, cold and bold. And that is what Russia sees itself as and needs to be seen as.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather K.</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>I liked the first logo at first glance. It looks like an Olympic logo. A generic Olympic logo.

For an Olympic games that are happening in 2014, the second logo does it for me. Granted, I wasn&#039;t excited when I heard that sochi.ru didn&#039;t send you to the Olympic games, but now it does. It feels more current, and if you look at the site with Olympic logo archives, the sochi.ru one fits in with its modern feel. (The London 2012 one is awful. Really bad.) 

Also, I&#039;m not a fan of the triangles. I get it . . . they represent snow/ice. But it looks like a Tetris game or 5th-grade geometry homework. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the first logo at first glance. It looks like an Olympic logo. A generic Olympic logo.</p>
<p>For an Olympic games that are happening in 2014, the second logo does it for me. Granted, I wasn&#8217;t excited when I heard that sochi.ru didn&#8217;t send you to the Olympic games, but now it does. It feels more current, and if you look at the site with Olympic logo archives, the sochi.ru one fits in with its modern feel. (The London 2012 one is awful. Really bad.) </p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not a fan of the triangles. I get it . . . they represent snow/ice. But it looks like a Tetris game or 5th-grade geometry homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankur Sethi</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankur Sethi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>I like the one with the leaves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the one with the leaves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter McWade</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter McWade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>To me the logo must represent, not just grab. The chosen one does represent Russia. The snowflakes, or what I see as ice, represent it well, too. Cold, sharp, edgy, clean, fresh, and new. This IS Russia today. But still keeps its heritage intact. 

I like it. Go have a look at past logos. 

Pete :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the logo must represent, not just grab. The chosen one does represent Russia. The snowflakes, or what I see as ice, represent it well, too. Cold, sharp, edgy, clean, fresh, and new. This IS Russia today. But still keeps its heritage intact. </p>
<p>I like it. Go have a look at past logos. </p>
<p>Pete :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer P.</title>
		<link>http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/2009/12/the-soul-of-the-empire/comment-page-2/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcwade.com/DesignTalk/?p=2586#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t a logo supposed to grab you like an electric punch? The chosen Sochi logo still doesn&#039;t do a thing for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t a logo supposed to grab you like an electric punch? The chosen Sochi logo still doesn&#8217;t do a thing for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
